High-energy and low-cost membrane-free CFB

PDF Publication Title:

High-energy and low-cost membrane-free CFB ( high-energy-and-low-cost-membrane-free-cfb )

Previous Page View | Next Page View | Return to Search List

Text from PDF Page: 007

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28880-x ARTICLE 1 L/min, followed by heat-treatment at 900 °C for 2 hours without toluene carrying gas to increase its electronic conductivity. The temperature increasing rate is 5.0 °C/min. Electrode preparation and electrochemical measurements. The working elec- trode was fabricated by pressing a mixture of the active materials (porous carbon or carbon-coated NaTi2(PO4)3), carbon black, and PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) binder at the weight ratio of 7:2:1 onto a titanium grid with a pressure of 10 MPa. The cyclic voltammograms (CV) were obtained using a three-electrode cell with an active carbon counter electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrode (0.197 V versus NHE). In the concentric cell, the inner diameter of the tube containing CCl4 and the RuO2-TiO2@C electrode is 2.0 mm, the thickness of the porous carbon elec- trode is 1.0 mm, the distance between the counter and working electrodes is 3.0 mm, and the thickness of the counter electrode is 3.0 mm. The height of the cell is 2.0 cm, and the volume capacity of the cell is around 2.0 mL. The total volume of the CCl4 reservoir is 6.0 mL, and the total volume of the NaCl/H2O reservoir is 2.0 mL. The CV measurements were carried out on a CHI660B electrochemical workstation. The galvanostatic charge and discharge profiles were obtained with an Arbin battery test station. Material characterizations. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken with Hitachi SU-70 analytical SEM (Japan). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data were collected on a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Raman spectroscopy was performed on a Horiba Jobin Yvon Labram Aramis using a 532 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser, attenuated to give ~900 μW power at the sample surface. Viscosity Measurements were carried out using a CANNON-FENSKE viscometer. Energy density calculations. The energy density of CFB was calculated based on the 600 mAh cell used in this study with Eq. (1). The average operating potential is 1.8 V at 10 mA/cm2, the volume of CCl4 is 6.0 mL, the volume of NaCl/H2O is 2.0 mL and the volume of Na(Ti2(PO4)3) is 0.592 mL (weight = 5.0 g, density = 2.96 g/mL, volume = 2.96 g/mL ÷ 5.0 g = 0.592 mL). The total volume of active materials is 8.592 mL. Based on these configurations, the cell-level energy density (based on active materials) is 125.7 Wh/L. 12. Lee, W., Park, G. & Kwon, Y. Alkaline aqueous organic redox flow batteries of high energy and power densities using mixed naphthoquinone derivatives. Chem. Eng. Sci. 386, 123985 (2020). 13. Goulet, M.-A. et al. Extending the lifetime of organic flow batteries via redox state management. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8014–8019 (2019). 14. Hofmann, J. D. et al. Quest for organic active materials for redox flow batteries: 2,3-Diaza-anthraquinones and their electrochemical properties. Chem. Mater. 30, 762–774 (2018). 15. Kwabi, D. G. et al. Alkaline quinone flow battery with long lifetime at pH 12. Joule 2, 1894–1906 (2018). 16. Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Chakrabarti, M. H., Hajimolana, S. A., Mjalli, F. S. & Saleem, M. Progress in flow battery research and development. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, R55 (2011). 17. Ulaganathan, M. et al. Recent advancements in all-vanadium redox flow. Batteries. Adv. Mater. Inter. 3, 1500309 (2016). 18. Wei, X. et al. Materials and systems for organic redox flow batteries: status and challenges. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 2187–2204 (2017). 19. Darling, R. M., Gallagher, K. G., Kowalski, J. A., Ha, S. & Brushett, F. R. Pathways to low-cost electrochemical energy storage: a comparison of aqueous and nonaqueous flow batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3459–3477 (2014). 20. Janoschka, T. et al. An aqueous, polymer-based redox-flow battery using non- corrosive, safe, and low-cost materials. Nature 527, 78–81 (2015). 21. Duduta, M. et al. Semi-solid lithium rechargeable flow battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 511–516 (2011). 22. Hamelet, S. et al. Non-aqueous Li-based redox flow batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, A1360–A1367 (2012). 23. Hine, F. & Yasuda, M. Studies on the Moor of the chlorine electrode process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 121, 1289 (1974). 24. Janssen, L. J. J., Starmans, Li. M. C., Visser, J. G. & Barendrecht, E. Mechanism of the chlorine evolution on a ruthenium oxide/titanium oxide electrode and on a ruthenium electrode. Electrochim. Acta 22, 1093–1100 (1977). 25. Agarwal, H., Florian, J., Goldsmith, B. R. & Singh, N. V2+/V3+ redox kinetics on glassy carbon in acidic electrolytes for vanadium redox flow batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2368–2377 (2019). 26. U.S. Geological Survey. Salt Statistics and Information. https://www.usgs.gov/ centers/national-minerals-information-center/salt-statistics-and-information/ (2022) 27. Moorhouse, J. Modern Chlor-alkali Technology, vol. 8 (John Wiley & Sons, 2008). 28. Winter, L. & Degner, G. Minute Epics Of Flight (Grosset & Dunlap, 1933). 29. Kim, J. T. & Jorne, J. The kinetics of a chlorine graphite electrode in the zinc- chlorine battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1473–1477 (1977). 30. Kim, J. T. & Jorne, J. Mass transfer of dissolved chlorine to a rotating-zinc hemisphere in ZnCI2 solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 89–94 (1978). 31. Jorne, J., Kim, J. T. & Kralik, D. The zinc-chlorine battery: half-cell overpotential measurements. J. Appl. Electrochem 9, 573–579 (1979). 32. Kim, J. T. & Jorne, J. The kinetics and mass transfer of zinc electrode in acidic zinc-chloride solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 127, 8–15 (1980). 33. Thomas, D. L. A LiAl/Cl2 battery with a four-component alkali-metal chloride electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 3553 (1989). 34. Holleck, G. L. The reduction of chlorine on carbon in AlCl3-KCl-NaCl melts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 119, 1158 (1972). 35. Gifford, P. R. & Palmisano, J. B. An aluminum/chlorine rechargeable cell employing a room temperature molten salt electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 650 (1988). 36. Hooley, J. G. A search for intercalation in the graphite-chlorine system. Carbon 8, 333–339 (1970). 37. Young, C. L. Sulfur dioxide. Chlorine, fluorine and chlorine oxides. Sol. Data Ser. 12, 333–445 (1983). 38. Li, L. et al. A stable vanadium redox-flow battery with high energy density for large-scale energy storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 394–400 (2011). 39. Li, X. et al. Investigation of electrolytes of the vanadium redox flow battery (VII): Prediction of the viscosity of mixed electrolyte solution (VOSO4 + H2SO4 + H2O) based on Eyring’s theory. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 134, 69–75 (2019). 40. Denton, D. A., Harrison, J. A. & Knowles, R. I. Chlorine evolution and reduction on RuO2/TiO2 electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 24, 521–527 (1979). 41. Exner, K. S., Anton, J., Jacob, T. & Over, H. Controlling selectivity in the chlorine evolution reaction over RuO2-based catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 11032–11035 (2014). 42. Zeradjanin, A. R., Menzel, N., Schuhmann, W. & Strasser, P. On the faradaic selectivity and the role of surface inhomogeneity during the chlorine evolution reaction on ternary Ti–Ru–Ir mixed metal oxide electrocatalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 13741–13747 (2014). 43. Karlsson, R. K. B. & Cornell, A. Selectivity between oxygen and chlorine evolution in the chlor-alkali and chlorate processes. Chem. Rev. 116, 2982–3028 (2016). 44. Arora, P. & Zhang, Z. Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104, 4419–4462 (2004). 45. Nguyen, T. & Savinell, R. F. Flow batteries. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 19, Energy density 1⁄4 Cell capacity ́ average potential Total volume of active materials Data availability ð1Þ The data that support the findings within this paper are available within the article and Supplementary Information. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper. Received: 14 January 2021; Accepted: 8 February 2022; References 1. Yang, Z. et al. Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem. Rev. 111, 3577–3613 (2011). 2. Ansari, M. I. H., Qurashi, A. & Nazeeruddin, M. K. Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in perovskite solar cells: a critical review. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C. 35, 1–24 (2018). 3. Lu, X., McElroy, M. B. & Kiviluoma, J. Global potential for wind-generated electricity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 10933–10938 (2009). 4. Dunn, B., Kamath, H. & Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334, 928–935 (2011). 5. Ponce de Leon, C., Frias-Ferrer, A., Gonzalez-Garcia, J., Szanto, D. A. & Walsh, F. C. Redox flow cells for energy conversion. J. Power Sources 29, 716–732 (2006). 6. Soloveichik, G. L. Flow batteries: current status and trends. Chem. Rev. 115, 11533–11558 (2015). 7. Leung, P. et al. Progress in redox flow batteries, remaining challenges and their applications in energy storage. RSC Adv. 2, 10125–10156 (2012). 8. Viswanathan, V., Crawford, A., Reed, D., Thomsen, ED. & Sprenkle, V. Chemistry agnostic cost performance model for redox flow batteries. DOE/OE Peer Review 2016 (2016). 9. Tan, R. et al. Hydrophilic microporous membranes for selective ion separation and flow-battery energy storage. Nat. Mater. 19, 195–202 (2020). 10. Chai, J., Lashgari, A. & Jiang, J. Electroactive materials for next-generation redox flow batteries: from inorganic to organic. ACS Symp . Seriers 1364, 1–47 (2020). 11. Schwan, S. et al. Substituent pattern effects on the redox potentials of quinone- based active materials for aqueous redox flow batteries. ChemSusChem 13, 5480–5488 (2020). 54–56 (2010). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2022)13:1281 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28880-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7

PDF Image | High-energy and low-cost membrane-free CFB

high-energy-and-low-cost-membrane-free-cfb-007

PDF Search Title:

High-energy and low-cost membrane-free CFB

Original File Name Searched:

Hou_et_al-2022-Nature_Communications.pdf

DIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing

Salgenx Redox Flow Battery Technology: Power up your energy storage game with Salgenx Salt Water Battery. With its advanced technology, the flow battery provides reliable, scalable, and sustainable energy storage for utility-scale projects. Upgrade to a Salgenx flow battery today and take control of your energy future.

CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@salgenx.com (Standard Web Page)